Excerpts:
The challenges Sora faced reflect deeper limitations of AI’s creative capacities that are becoming harder to ignore.
Counter-creative bias explains why so many AI-generated images and videos, even when they vary in subject or style, end up sharing a similar look and feel. And I think it explains why so many artists and other creatives don’t seem to be widely adopting these tools. Good creative work involves pushing boundaries, not simply coming up with something that’s passable and palatable.
That hopeful period appears to be over. Once pixels had to be rendered through the control of language, I think it hampered its potential as an artistic medium. And now we’re left with a technology that seems best suited for memes, spam, deepfakes and porn.
Good creative work involves pushing boundaries, not simply coming up with something that’s passable and palatable.
And that’s why Techbros will never understand other people. They just make a minimum viable product. They don’t know what ambition in other people looks like when it isn’t for wealth at the expense of others.
The problem with generative “AI”’s “creative utility” is that it is fundamentally regurgitative, not creative, and has no actual capability for novel insight or inspiration due to the nature of its architecture.
Also whoever had the idea to automate art before literally anything else is an enemy of humanity.