• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Don’t hate them for it, because they never made a conscious decision to do it. It may be incredibly frustrating that some people are sabotaging everyone else like this, but it’s not really their fault. They’ve simply been raised in a rotten society and brainwashed so hard their brains are literally fried.

    Those of us who happened to avoid a similar fate are not necessarily better. Probably just lucky.

    • sureshot0@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, you did not avoid a similar fate. The way in which you are a bootlicker is probably invisible to you, and it shows itself during different contexts. There is no way in Hell everyone in your environment was touched by this but you and you alone came away unscathed. Hubris.

  • VanRayInd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some people have the mindset - “If we take money away from billionaires now, then I’ll have less money when I become a billionaire in the future!”

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’ve heard this a lot. I cannot think of anyone who actually thinks they have a shot at being a billionaire. Maybe a shot at winning the lottery, which is still crazy, but the taxes are predetermined for that so it’s not like they’re going to increase on a winner after they’ve won and already paid. There’s always the steady drumbeat of “taxes are evil” from everyone living in a fantasyland that modern civilized life will continue without them.

      IMO it’s more of a fear thing. We’ve been told they’re the “job creators” or whatever (even Musk has only created 100k jobs out of 163 million jobs despite being the richest person in the country). You’re already getting their “preferential treatment” and people are afraid they’ll withdraw their favor, as meager as it is, despite the damage they do to everything else.

      • BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nah, the aspiration isn’t so much that people think they could be billionaires, merely that anyone could be. It creates a social bond between the working class and billionaires, it dissolves the identity divide for the working class. Working class people think “they’re hard workers just like me,” while billionaires use their identification as working class to selectively absolve themselves of the responsibility they have.

      • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Americans are stupid, hateful and willing to shit all over each other if they think they will personally benefit, even if know it is only temporary

        Selfishness is baked into what passes for culture in that backwards dump

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Like with most things, it’s the minority that messes it up for everyone. In this case there are a large minority that is either indifferent to or actually revels in the suffering of others. They seem to mostly be republican. For them, the cruelty is the point, or else they’re selfish and indifferent, which I believe is indistinguishable.

  • Schal330@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was having a chat with a friend recently about the cost of living in the UK. I mentioned one issue is the wealth inequality and billionaires are the problem.

    “If we do a wealth tax they’ll leave!”

    Sent this link https://equalitytrust.org.uk/evidence-base/billionaire-britain-2025/ to explain how a large proportion of billionaires just extract wealth.

    Not entirely sure they were convinced. They have the mentality that billionaires create jobs for everyone and are super hard workers that worked their way up.

    I don’t want to just sit back and call people who look up to billionaires idiots. I want to be able to have strong compelling points to make them change their mind.

      • Ddub@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        And then what? If they want to take their wealth with them they’d need to sell up, so the job creation would remain, the assets would remain, possibly the currency would be slightly weaker, and so importa would be slightly more expensive, which would encourage the local economy… What is the awful outcomes you’re imagining from the ultra rich leaving?

      • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Dude…just google it, it’s a myth. The people that want you to believe it are the ones thaf benefit from you believing it.

        Heck, look at the interview Bezos just did. Notice how there wasn’t even the possibility in his worldview of him being taxed more. Meanwhile, he lies about how much he pays and parrots the cherrypicked statistic of 40% of income taxes are paid by the top 1% of income earners. Guess what Bezos is? Not one of those. He takes an income of 80K, a little above average in terms if income earners. His wealth isn’t taxed while he does fuck all and his employees toil away and he generates wealth off of their labor.

        Shit, in America alone the top marginal rate was over 90%. They’re still here.

        This also misses the point that the level of wealth consolidation is a failure of the system to provide for its people. They shouldn’t exist in the first place.

        And they should be happy that most people are saying to tax them more. But these dipshits equate that to terrorism and racial slurs, so yeah, let’s see just how deluded they are and just how much pain the people can put up with.

          • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 days ago

            😮‍💨

            A literal book of research published from Stanford

            https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/myth-millionaire-tax-flight

            https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/what-republicans-and-democrats-can-learn-myth-millionaire-tax-flight

            While everyone seems aware of a handful of high-profile millionaires decamping to low-tax states for tax reasons, in truth few move in response to state tax rates. Young examined tax data from every millionaire in the United States over thirteen years. He found that, even over that long time horizon, only 0.3% of all millionaires, on net, moved to a lower tax state. A larger share—about 2.5 percent-- move from one state to another each year, but most do not migrate for tax reasons.

            Millionaires are not very mobile, and when they do move across state lines, taxes play a small role in the decision. Tax-induced migration among millionaires is not zero, but it is fairly close to zero.

            https://ips-dc.org/release-wealth-expands-after-higher-state-taxes-on-high-income-earners/

            Two years into Massachusetts’ millionaires’ tax and a higher tax rate on $250,000 in capital gains in Washington state shows that the millionaire class grew by 38.6 percent in Massachusetts and 46.9 percent in Washington, respectively. Their wealth grew by more than $580 billion in current dollars in Massachusetts and $748 billion in Washington state between 2022 and 2024.

            Wealth flight fears are misguided. The number of wealthy individuals and their cumulative wealth grew after the enactment of higher taxes on high earners in Massachusetts and a progressive capital gains tax on high-wealth Washingtonians.

            And when it comes to the followup argument of “bUt It DoNt BrInG ReVenUE” it was largely not due to flight but instead from exemptions and tax breaks and poor policing of taxes on said wealthy individuals and being generally too broad and policy in place making those who were highly mobile to move.

            https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/publication-study-wealth-taxation-including-net-wealth-capital-and-exit-taxes-2026-04-15_en

            And some lessons from Norway who have had wealth taxes since 1892, and by which they implememted a 37.8% wealth tax if you do choose to leave. If you really want the parasites to stay, make it worth their while, they only know how to speak money after all. After bleeding our system dry and profiting off of our labor and tax dollars through subsidies and utilizing our public services to pay workers less, it’s the least they can do for us allowing them to exist in the first place.

            https://www.aol.com/articles/analysis-norways-wealth-tax-trades-050140872.html

            • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’m not saying that people would leave to boring states just for tax benefits. I’m saying that people would leave to different countries.

              I don’t understand how Norway implements it’s wealth tax.

              • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                If you’re not willing to read and understand then your opinion is worthless, we have no reason to listen to someone so malignantly uninformed. You ask for sources, implying there are none, then when shown you backtrack and ask questions that the sources themselves answer.

                Continue aiding Trump and the billionaires, I’m sure if you work hard enough you’ll be one one day.

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Did you not read the comment you’re responding to? Them leaving would be a good thing dumbass

          • flabberjabber@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            They can’t leave when their businesses, properties, assets, and income are derived from your country. Much of it isn’t easily movable, if at all. Most of a billionaire’s wealth isn’t in cold hard capital cash, it’s in a mixture of assets and yearly income from said assets.

            They can choose to leave, and live wherever they’d like to live. But their place of residence, if legislated properly, would have no bearing on wealth taxes instituted at the asset or income level. If we chose to tax them regardless of being domicile or not: it is a legislative choice.

            It would have no bearing on whether we can still legally and feasibly tax the fuck out of them.

            What you’re saying is disinformation, friend. It serves the wealth class well when it’s spread around. But if you stop and think about it as an idea for a second it quickly falls apart.

  • 4grams@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    There are some people who are just wired to submit, and there are a lot more of them than you would think. I don’t know how to explain it, but I know some otherwise really awesome people, smart in most ways, but happily submit themselves to authority time and time again; despite it burning them over and over.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think I’m more productive when I have someone else doing the executive thinking and “just” assigning me “simple” tasks.

      But, I can still recognize Rentiers as bad for the economy in specific and society in general.

      • 4grams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That really interesting, honestly. I’m the kind who likes to break down task, figure out things, and I get really resentful when I’m given simple tasks without the context to understand them.

        I don’t think what you are describing is what I mean though. I totally get having things broken down and simplified, especially in the context of productivity. That just seems like you understand yourself and workflow.

        I’m taking more about an authoritarian mindset in values. I can tell based on the rest of your reply that you haven’t outsourced your judgement :)

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, I guess isn’t not really about simple vs. complex for me, I don’t mind having to research, break down, or even delegate; but I want to clear goal. “Improve the login flow” is a task I hate, and probably won’t do well or fast. “Allow Yubikey as an alternative to Google Authenticator for our 2FA” is something I can knock out, even if I’m totally new to the code base (and I’ve not yet ever used the Google Authenticator API or a Yubikey).

          I know metrics make for poor goals (Goodhart’s Law) but I like a task that is metric-driven. I do tend to be careful to not be overly fixated on the metric and rather the improvement it’s meant to reflect.

          • 4grams@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Gotcha. Yeah, you and me both then, I feel exactly the same way. “Improved login” is such an undefined and wide space to begin with. Something like that is what a low executive function brain would ask for.

            I’d say, you operate at a higher level, sounds to me like you are very good at executive level thinking. You see the problem space for what it is, and undefined is an awful place to be, since there is so many avenues that would fulfill the “request”. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to walk people through how to provide useful requirements :)

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    alot of propaganda, especially how movies and shows glorify being rich, plus als in irl, its a plus if worship white ones.

  • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think billionaires and corporations spend good money to have people comment favorably about them. Eventually, via osmosis, those opinions percolate into some of the general public and they start spewing the same lines

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think a Disney song might explain some of it…

    • You! (Whoop dee-wit) I wanna be like you (hap du hoowee-doo) I wanna walk like you (chuu) Talk like you, too (chuu) (We-be-de-be-du-wu) you see it’s true (shubbedey-du) Someone like me (scubey-dubey-dubey) Can learn to be Like someone like me (take me home, daddy!) Can learn to be Like someone like you (one more time!) Yeah, can learn to be Like someone like me Zi-de-da-bapp bapp bada dodel-dad’n dad’n dad’n dad’n dad, eh Ah-babba di-di-dibbi-di Now, I’m the king of the swingers Oh, the jungle VIP
  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This meritocracy bullshit is the equivalent of peasants who believed God appointed their monarchs.

    Milord, that one stole thy crops! His greed betrays him, for he steals for his family too! Stone him, for he seeks to usurp you, milord! Perhaps, by thine benevolence, thou wouldst find it pleasing to reward thine loyal subject for defending your crop and your honor! I only seek to humbly serve milord and his Holiness!

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    A lot of lemmy and reddit comments are written by bots or marketing companies. Theres a whole industry of companies that sell the ability to influrnce others’ opinions. Both political and via comments on products.