Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is an better idea. I was going to shoot them with a paintball gun.

  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why aren’t they just… Removing them?

    Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.

    • frostysauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you had read the article you’d know that the cities aren’t sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they’re covering them while working that out.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve heard the excuse that they’re private property so they can’t. They’re not hard to remove though. They’re usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not so sure about that because even if they are privately owned, that doesn’t mean they have the inherent right to be mounted on a city pole. The property isnt harmed by removing them from the pole and storing them in a deep underground bunker infested with Hanta Virus rats, black widows, and alligators.

    • Pulsar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I remember correctly the agreement is some kind of lease, so the city/county doesn’t really own them after they are installed.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t just collect video either. Audio, network traffic, Bluetooth devices, tons of electronic intelligence can still be gotten with covered cameras

      • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Bluetooth tracking is much more sinister than people know. The city I’m in has devices specifically for this placed strategically along with the alpr and cameras. Its fuckin’ wild. Can’t even leave without them tracking you.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know how, but I bet there’s an enterprising way to make a nice cheap battery powered Bluetooth scrambler that can be stuck right on one of those poles with a magnet and just absolutely ruin their signals.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Welp. It’s too bad the shitty hotel I used to work at got shut down by the city.

        We had TONS of meth heads that would be very appriciative of that information.

      • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Really though, don’t do the precious metals part, cuz that’s what will get you caught. Carefully destroying them? Very doable, I strongly suspect.

        • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The precious metals content realistically isn’t interesting at all unfortunately. You could make a bit reselling the internal components (like probably not even 3 digits), but the value on the actual copper/etc is negligible. The solar panel is probably the most interesting piece, but the components are cheap as fuck.

          • halferect@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Its to encourage meth heads who only need 20 bucks and are desperate enough to go to jail for a lil bit of copper

      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would have bit of extra respect for a youtuber breaking down to get the precious metals out of specifically flok cameras

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do also the other thing, where you brake it apart. Same thing, but it’s permanently.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I read the beginning of the title as “Cities are Cowering” and now I think it could easily be a part of an alternate title.

      Like your the damn government… Just remove the devices, tell Flock where they can pick them up in the next two weeks otherwise they will be sold as is on open market and pay the termination fee or potential lawsuit. Cities get sued like all the time and I am confident even a moderately competent lawyer could find a cheap way out.

  • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fun fact the panel, inverter, and battery set up in these do not have any tracking features, that’s all in the internals for the camera controller. It’s enough to charge any smart phone or tablet if someone you know is living outside and should have a need of that. You do not need anything more than a Philips head screwdriver for most versions, and a security bit for others, both of which you can have for pennies at any hardware store.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bring an all metal tool box to put the camera in it. Instant faraday cage.

        Best to open it somewhere that is not frequented by you though, then you can remove the battery and other useful stuff for recycling.

        Or just throw the whole thing in the nearest dumpster and let the garbage company take care of it.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess the problem starts when two other cameras are watching the same area the first camera is in.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are the city. They can send public works out there to dismantle the cameras and then send Flock the bill for it, if they are unwilling to dismantle themselves.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d like to think that the bag is step 1. Step 2 is to balance an old car tire on top, and set it on fire.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago
        1. City installs trash bags because they’re contractually obligated to keep the devices installed and powered on
        2. Someone hosts an impromptu Office Space fan meetup, with a fun reenactment of the printer scene
        3. City sees this, responds with an obvious but legally non-actionable tweet response suggesting it continue (e.g. “Fartsburg loves Mike Judge films, too! So nice to see our citizens enjoying the various forms of recreation and socialization ths city has to offer.”), along with some conspicuously-placed garbage cans near all of the cameras’ installed locations.
        4. ???
        5. (No) Profit. (for Flock)
  • Sirdubdee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder how safe the poles are, compared to well tested road signs that are up. Those easily break off when hit. Will you end up with a solar panel through your windshield in an accident? I feel like one good lawsuit could make Flock have to replace every one of them if a lawyer can convince 12 people that they are a physical danger.

    • Killer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen multiple videos showing they aren’t installed properly and won’t break away.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    the city was sharing Flock camera data for immigration enforcement

    Ah, these are in American cities.

    apparently on accident,

    Oh yes, definitely American.

    (Yes I know I skipped over the part about Ohio)

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      honestly idk why they bothered covering them. just disconnect them… as long as they aren’t damaged I doubt flock could seek anything on it.

      • em2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        likely safer if they ever get caught. it’s not damaging property if there’s simply a trash bag over it.