Over the past few decades, the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated—often referred to as “nones”—has grown rapidly. In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%. Scholars have debated whether this change simply reflects a general decline in belief, or whether it signals something more complex. The research team wanted to explore the deeper forces at play: Why are people leaving institutional religion? What are they replacing it with? And how are their personal values shaping that process?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No no no, this ancient religion from the Middle East based off of several other cultures mythology is the TRUTH!

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My guess is that the extreme hatred flowing out of outspoken “Christians” in the US is a huge turn-off, as it should be.

      • Ushmel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Not if you actually tithe 10% like they want you to and have insurance and/or community support. Which of course not everyone has. But my point is that more insurance covers it now than 30 years ago.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%.

    That’s … a surprisingly slow transition. I can understand that an official turn away from christianity only started in the 1970s, fueled by a cultural revolution.

    But the fact that only 25% of people have officially said no to religion as of today is staggering me. I would have thought it would be closer to 80%, maybe.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Considering who has the fertility advantage here, I am not sure this trend will even continue indefinitely. I’ve seen it in my own distant family, the only ones to have a BUNCH were the weird-ass Christian extremists whose kids are all named Isaac and shit.

      The rest of us mostly had no kids, with a few having 1 or 2.

      And obviously, the intro to Idiocracy, but it’s true.

  • Zenith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Everyone, myself included always come back to the same reason - there is no proof.

    If I was given actual proof of a god or pantheon or any other ridiculous nonsense I’d absolutely change my mind but actual proof magic exists can’t exist because magic isn’t real

    I fully accept that I don’t and can’t truly understand the universe but where the fuck does that somehow morph into “god did it” it’s ok not to know everything I don’t need made up bullshit to fill the gaps so I can feel better about not having every answer. Live with not knowing, that’s what being human is meant to be, acceptance

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”. by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.

      the issue is more with organized religion. there’s a lot of rules and bureaucracy in it, and most of that is outdated.

      • richieadler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.

        Most believers will assert that their god exists in a different, more concrete way. The number of persons able or willing to discuss the topic on your terms is an insignificant minority.

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    They have tech now. And conspiracy theories. Lots of stuff to cult about. They can build their own religion if they want.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    For their study, Schnabel and his colleagues used data from the National Study of Youth and Religion. This included four waves of longitudinal survey data and 183 in-depth interviews conducted from 2003 to 2013. The sample included over 1,300 individuals, each tracked from adolescence into young adulthood. […] The number of respondents attending religious services dropped dramatically between 2003 and 2013.

    The study used data that’s 12 years old! Millennials are not young adults anymore. At this point it’s well known that Americans, especially the younger cohorts, are moving away from religion, so why even bother reanalyzing ancient data?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It is very useful to reanalyze old data. Recently, a study came out that concluded that we have misunderstood the role of nutrition and calories in fitness, and it examined studies over a period of decades to come to the conclusions. You don’t always need new data to make new conclusions.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Gen Z is more religious and conservative, than millennials, a lot more

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m not sure they got to play the tutorial levels that we did.

          A lot of us millennials had hotmail accounts that got the actual stereotypical Nigerian Prince emails. They were obvious as shit, so we learned to put our guard up. Gen Z came of age into a world full of pig butchering scams and other such sophisticated shit.

  • Zomg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Because I don’t need God to be a good person, or know what good morals are.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think it was Penn Jillette who put it best…

      I murder all I want to, and the amount I want is zero

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Most of us get our sense of decency from the inside. Some can only find it in a book. Which is more dangerous the person who sense of right and wrong are with them or the ones who are just one crisis of faith from not having any?

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not to mention you’ll do a better job at it if you think for yourself on the subject rather than delegating it to a spiritual leader with potentially dubious agendas

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Here’s my theory why:

    • People nowadays have higher average education and can much more easilly spot the logical inconsistences in Religion.
    • People are so overexposed and overwhelmed by swindles in the modern era that they are more naturally spotting the swindle nature of ancient swindles such as Religion.
  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, my whole life, I’ve lived in a society where organized Christianity has overwhelmingly been a force for evil, rather than a force for good. Fuck, I straight-up believe that most Evangelical Christians are devil worshipers. If your religion leads you to hate, you aren’t worshiping God, you’re worshiping the Devil.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Christianity is, by definition, a cult of human sacrifice.

      Kinda puts the entire faith into perspective.

        • athairmor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They ritualistically eat the body and blood of their god/savior.

          Let that sink in.

          • Hazor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            They wear symbols of a torturous execution device as jewelry, and use it to decorate their homes.

            • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              the thing is that the cross has taken on new meaning in christianity. to them, it’s not so much a “torturous execution device” as you have said, but rather proof that jesus christ can even live after that. in this way, it is a symbol of life after death, somehow.

              • Hazor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Right. I was replying to someone who reframed a tradition of Christianity in a way which highlighted how it could be seen as disturbing or bizarre to someone who was unfamiliar with Christianity; I simply did the same with another tradition.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, they were in luck… he’s only mostly dead. If he was all the way dead, it wouldn’t have worked. but Mostly dead? Miracle Max can work with that.

        • Clasm@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Suicidal Death Cult

          They are actively doing everything in their power to bring about the end of the world.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            though according to their belief, the “end of the world” is actually the start of a new, eternal world.

            also, as far as i’m aware of, it’s not so much the “end of the world”, but rather the “end of time”, where time refers to the progression towards god.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          When you’re actively trying to bring about the end of the world, there’s no more apt description.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Death Cult Armageddon, great Dimmu album. My parents got it for me along with Enthrone Darkness Triumphant for Christmas one year but they wouldn’t buy me Diablo II because Diablo “didn’t fit the theme of the holiday.”

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            In all fairness, Diablo has an entirely different lore than Christianity, I can see where they were coming from. We want to burn Yahweh, not Anu.

        • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Dooms day death cult.

          Lead by Jesus, the dooms day death cult leader.

          I hear he’s a “good guy.”

          I don’t think dooms day death cult leaders, make believe or not and I just mean a historical grifter non magical, are good people.

          • Hazor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Fwiw, the belief that it becomes the actual flesh of Jesus is a Catholic thing, by my understanding. In my Protestant upbringing, it was regarded as entirely symbolic.

            Oh, and we did it with grape juice instead of wine, because apparently Jesus hated alcohol or something. Just don’t ask why then his first miracle was turning water into wine.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              The grape juice was used because a lot of evangelicals are teetotalers and think even a shot of wine is gonna corrupt peeps.

              Which, goes to the other reason Protestants frequently don’t: they don’t see a need to serve wine, while they don’t want to potentially cause an alcoholic to stumble. The chance might be small, but then it’s all symbolic anyway.

              Also, grape juice is cheaper.

      • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not really; one guy died, by his own choice, but came back to life two days later. A real “cult of human sacrifice” would require it as an ongoing practice and for the victims to stay dead.

        • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Jesus alone doesn’t make it a death cult. It’s a death cult because the whole religion is predicated on death. Dying is the entire point. Your entire life is a means to gain the rewards of dying and only then will you truly be happy.

          • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            So much wrongitude here I don’t know if this is genuinely what you think or if you’re just trolling.

            Jesus came to earth so that we could know God, here and now. To nick someone else’s quote: It’s not pie in the sky when you die, it’s steak on your plate while you wait. John 10:10: “I have some so that they may have life, and have it to the full.”

            I suggest you read the Bible some time. Start with the Gospels, either Luke or John. Not as a means to convert you, but so that you can understand what Christianity is really about, instead of spouting uninformed nonsense about it. You’re currently the equivalent of those Christians who say the equivalent of “evolution is just a theory”.

            • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Your reward is in heaven right? So the endgame is death. You might get to eat steak while you are alive but you dont get the whole meal until you die. That’s a death cult.

              • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                No. John 17:3 “Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.”

                My “reward” is right here, right now. While I’m still alive.

                A death cult encourages people either to kill or to die. Christianity is not one of those.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just because there was only one sacrificial offering doesn’t mean jesus wasn’t a sacrificial offering.

          The whole thing about jesus being both fully god and fully man is that no “normal” human would ever be sinless- and therefore would be an inadequate sacrifice. Therefore god became man- that is, jesus- whose sole purpose was to be a “perfect” sacrifice.

          • not_fond_of_reddit@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            But isn’t the whole trinity thing God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit the same entity? So God sacrificed himself for himself… wouldn’t really call a two day nap for some eternal being a sacrifice either.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re expecting it all to make sense. It’s like a the lies a 2 year old tells to explain and justify having gotten into the chocolate cake, after having tried to lay it off like they hadn’t (missing the whole having it all over their face thing,).

              The longer they’re allowed to go, and the more you poke holes the weirder it gets.

            • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              This was always my biggest struggle growing up in a catholic house. “He sacrificed himself to save everyone who came before and will come after.”

              Like, is that really that big of a deal? Shit if i was presented with the option of a much smaller number than infinity, idk say 1000, id sacrifice myself. AND i don’t know that I’m god or that my father is god and that ill be taken care of for all eternity.

              In all reality, that numbers way less than 1000 for strangers, and if you include anyone i know/care about, that number could be as low as 1.

    • CXORA@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No. The christoan God is evil. They’re doing exactly as their religion demands.

    • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your religion leads you to hate, you aren’t worshiping God, you’re worshiping the Devil.

      And this is how wars between religions start…

      Maybe try to move away from that God/Devil thing. It’s a foolish, naive, human-centered worldview.

      • bpalmerau@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok, we can restate it. If your religion leads you to hate, you aren’t on the side of good, you’re on the side of bad?

        • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          alright, but is the world really as black and white as that? Is there really a clear Good Side, and a clear Bad Side?

          • bpalmerau@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Religious people seem to think so. But we can restate again: If your religion leads you to hate, your religion may cause you to act unethically.

          • Tinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            If your religion leads you to hate, the religion and its followers are bad. The end.