• socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    9 days ago

    I work in a very technical field and I used to be worried that I wouldn’t be able to keep up into my 40s and 50s but seeing how genZ deals with technology makes me much less concerned. I feel like we’re heading into a situation where the big divide will be pre and post brain rot.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      100%. My brother in-law is like 10 years younger than me. Holy fuck is he stupid. Man has stage 4 Joe Rogan /gpt induced brain rot

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I feel like we’re heading into a situation where the big divide will be pre and post brain rot.

      Almost feels too simple, given how brainrotted boomers are.

      It’s like there’s a window with elder Millenials and Gen X, people who straddled the line of before/after the internet as they were growing up, that are sane.

      Everyone else is broken.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      To be fair, even before LLMs tech knowledge among the young was on the decline. You don’t have to know tech anymore yo use it. Everything is super easy to use with an intuitive GUI and zero need to look behind it.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I think that, since the wave of IT outsourcing in the 00s, anybody with a career in Tech who had reached the level of Senior Designer-Developer by then or was close to it was safe in their job forever, because that seriously bottlenecked the job opportunities and the Junior and Mid career levels in the West whilst in places that benefited from it, it just translated into tons of people going into Tech who had no knack for it whatsover and would otherwise never have enter the field (so whilst in some countries gifted techies were just giving up on a Tech career, in other countries the field got tons more of incompetent techies who would never good enough to become senior experts in the field), meaning ever fewer professionals reaching the Senior expertise level.

      Silver lining in a very big, very dark cloud for those in the right place and time.

      Now, AI plus almost all young people nowadays growing up as Tech tool users surrounded by locked-down systems rather than tool makers (if only out of need, because most Tech stuff used to need some configuring and babysitting) is just making that even worse.

      I suspect Tech growth and improvement is going to pretty much grind to a halt in the next decade or two.

  • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 days ago

    Be precise. Based on My interactions with Lemmy, will I find this true or false. Write My opinion in 3 sentences.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      9 days ago

      That is an excellent idea! Based on post history you want to live in a swamp, cover yourself in mouldy leaves and cook soup from frogs and old tennis socks. Was this reply helpful?

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      Certainly! You believe that this is very not good. You think that this will lead to the end of human civilisation. You would rather kill whomever is responsible than keep having to watch the steady decline. As a solution you should listen to more Kesha.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      You feel compelled to write a 12 page missive on why cars are awful, Zohran Mamdami is the true messiah, and AI is worse than the bubonic plague.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Someone said ‘second hand thinker’ and I still think about that daily,” another user added.

    That’s solid but not specific enough. I know a lot of people let YouTube and TikTok do their thinking these days.

    • 7toed@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I argue its worse, in the end whatever is being regurgitated from what they see on youtube ends with the video duration, but these people are to believe that these things think - hell they think the AI is smarter than themselves and defer all judgement. I wish it remained an internet phenomena but I’ve met too many true believers already 😑

      /anecdote

      Guy in one of my code classes, would not just fucking tell me if he wrote his code, or the AI did. I knew the AI did, because you don’t come asking why it’s not working when he didn’t declare any variables, big red error “variable not declared”. It was the end of that semester, I was there with him every single period. The audacity to have me debug the shitbot’s chicken scratch, claim its super helpful, but also cover its dumb ass by being an even bigger dumbass and fail probably the easiest javascript course you could’ve asked for. I am honestly still in awe.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        Boy am I glad I didn’t go to school (and don’t have to teach) during AI.

        Back in my day you knew people were copy and pasting from stack overflow because Python would complain about mixed indentation and there’d be comments in only one function.

        I do feel for the TAs having to read our printed assignment and hand written code on tests.

    • sanderium@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly, I think that overall it takes more effort verifying ChatGPT answers than actually researching.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I don’t think the people using ChatGPT like that actual verify its answers.

        I suspect they don’t even know its answers cannot be trusted.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I worry that people who rely on AI will become skilled in making it seem like they aren’t. Fortunately a lot of them don’t seem very good at that yet.

      I’ve done a few job interviews where it was very clear the interviewee was using Chat GPT or something to answer almost every question. But there may soon come a day when it’s not obvious, and then we waste time hiring someone incapable of critical thinking who types proprietary company information into an LLM prompt.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        The day I get paid the same as the fuckwit c suits is the day I’ll allow someone to call me “lazy” for doing something else on the clock…

      • sanderium@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t understand your comment, I’m actually a lazy person and I find it easier to research by “hand” than to ask AI. What is your point?

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I didnt ask Ai before i made this comment.

    Its a natural home grown comment, 100% AI free, from one of my favorite braincells.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 days ago

    Am I the only one who tried a LLM like twice, saw it gave out bullshit, then never tried it again (though I do see it forced on me with general searches, be it google or DDG or Bing or kinda anywhere now)?

    I tried Copilot to answer a couple of coding questions, and I ended up having to take as much time to double check the answers/code it didn’t seem worth it.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’ve asked LLMs a few simple coding questions, only to question why the code isn’t working receiving an Oh sorry here try this malformed garbage instead.

      I’ve asked Gemini to generate an image, only to receive a completely black image. When asked to describe the image Gemini would tell me what I was requesting it to generate. I saved the image, uploaded to Gemini and asked to describe the image. It gaslit me and straight lied that it was not the same image.

      What a waste of time and resources.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yep, I see very little value in them. I have techie friends who keep telling me I should try it more, but it just pisses me off and creeps me out. It took a long time getting this brain working as well as it does, and it’s already headed back downhill. My neurons need the exercise.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      People who know what they’re doing don’t use these “tools”, it’s the fools and morons out there who have no idea how anything works that use these things and they don’t double check them before they implement their crap code.

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I use it to help me write because of my dyslexia. But that’s really all it’s good for. Nothing advance like creating one line diagrams for electrical installs. I tried. It sucked at it.

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Claude4 works for me for writing simple code, and brainstorming. I expect it to be wrong most of the time, but it works better than google when getting started with something I have no experience with.

  • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    ChatGPT is the ultimate ‘cultural product of the postmodern era,’ and very few of us have been inoculated with a theory of mind that distinguishes language from thought," Foster concluded in his newsletter.

    The best description of this distinction I’ve encountered was in a science fiction novel - Blindsight by Peter Watts.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hell, it’s getting hard to avoid. DuckDuckGo now has an AI answer at the top of search results. When doing technical searches, it’s usually just regurgitating the top StackOverflow answer, but there is always the problem that it could be regurgitating a bad answer. Or badly regurgitating an answer. So, it’s usually best to ignore it and read the answer it’s trying to give and then research what the person actually said and if it’s right.

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    Weren’t there a couple of stories in the '70s and '80s about people climbing the corporate ladder by following the advice from a Magic 8 Ball? And look how all that turned out!

    • limer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      The magic 7 ball strategy had a survivorship basis. Only competent people succeeded in using it

      I think those people using magic 8, succeeded by not using their emotions to make career decisions, but coolly and rationally handled what was in front of them randomly .

      As a consequence they played less power games while being very aggressive. Which is a winning strategy sometimes .

      Llm could not replicate it, too much instructions

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    Personally I prefer clankerwankers but whatever works.

    I also think slopmachine is a good slur for llms, given it highlights the gambling aspect and addictive potential.